home/logo
  
imgnews | action | information | events | contact | search 

key indigenous australian issues

  • art
  • culture
  • health
  • history
  • human rights
  • law and justice
  • native title
  • social justice
  • repatriation
  • stolen generations
  • stolen wages



    keep in touch
    register to receive eniar's
    newsletter

    click here




  • home | news l

    Letter from Amnesty International, Secretary General to Canadian Prime Minister

    INTERNATIONAL SECRETARIAT

    8 June 2007
    Ref.: TG AMR 20/2007.01

    Prime Minister Hon Stephen Harper
    Office of the Prime Minister
    80 Wellington Street
    Ottawa
    K1A 0A2
    Canada

    Dear Prime Minister Harper:

    I am writing to urge the Government of Canada to withdraw its opposition to the adoption by the UN General Assembly of the vitally important and long overdue UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

    Canada has long enjoyed an international reputation as a leader in the promotion of human rights. Canada's influence was put to good effect in the final years of negotiation of the Declaration when Canadian representatives were able to bring states and Indigenous peoples together around a common vision of human rights protection.

    Regrettably, Canada's reversal of its position has had a negative impact on the prospects for the adoption of the Declaration. Although the draft Declaration was adopted by the UN Human Rights Council on June 29 the UN General Assembly went on to call for further "consultation". Today, it is uncertain whether the Declaration will return to the General Assembly later this year for final adoption or will be consigned to an endless cycle of renegotiation.

    I am concerned, Prime Minister, that a critical opportunity to advance the cause of international human rights is at risk of being lost.

    According to Canadian government briefing documents, obtained through an Access to Information request, senior Canadian officials who reviewed the final text of the Declaration recommended that Canada support its immediate adoption. Furthermore, these documents state that at one point both the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Department of Indian and Northern Affairs had indicated that they were in favour of its adoption.

    I note as well that the Declaration has been publicly supported by all three opposition parties in the Canadian Parliament and that the Parliamentary Committee on Aboriginal Affairs has twice called on your government to support the adoption of the Declaration.

    Given this, it is unclear why your government has persisted in opposing the Declaration.

    Human rights declarations provide inspiration and guidance to governments, state institutions such as courts, and the public as a whole, but do not directly bind states to specific actions. Drafted to apply to a great diversity of situations around the world, such declarations cannot be interpreted in isolation from other human rights instruments or apart from the context in which they will be applied. The articles in the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the Canadian government has objected to, such as the articles on land rights, do not describe absolute or unconditional rights. In their application, these provisions will necessarily be interpreted in relation to all other existing rights and obligations – a fact that Canadian officials previously emphasized when they were working to build support for the Declaration.

    Claims that the Declaration is incompatible with existing Canadian human rights protections distort the reality of how the Declaration can be reasonably interpreted. But more than that, the suggestion that this demand for basic recognition of Indigenous peoples' rights is excessive, a threat to public interest, or a potential source of conflict, risks playing on and promoting the very prejudice and discrimination the Declaration is intended to counter.

    Around the world, Indigenous peoples are among the most impoverished, most marginalized, and most frequently victimized sectors of society. Their rights are routinely ignored in favour of wealthier, more powerful interests. This discrimination is cloaked by the racist denigration of Indigenous cultures and the paternalistic claim that non-Indigenous elites know what is best for Indigenous peoples.

    The Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples presents an inspiring alternative vision of collaboration and reconciliation among Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples working together to advance the rights of all. Implementation of this vision will not be easy. It will be an uphill struggle to undo centuries of prejudice and discrimination, around the world. But that, in fact, has been the goal of this whole long process since the drafting of the Declaration first began more than twenty years ago.

    I hope that after further deliberation your government will feel able to support the Declaration as adopted by the UN Human Rights Council.

    Yours sincerely,

    Irene Khan
    Secretary General

    Source: Amnesty International


    Further information: human rights issues page - includes news index and external links


    || click to go to the top of this page

     

    2004
    palm island
    an aboriginal man dies in custody

    Gone for a Song by Jeff waters

    gone for a song
    by journalist
    jeff waters explores the issues surounding the suspicious death in custody, the botched police investigations and the secret evidence which still remains suppressed by the coroner's court

    eniar logohome | news | action | information | events
    terms & conditions | gallery | search |journalists | European languages
    Where am I? -  •  click to go to the top of this page
    all content copyright ENIAR © 2008 except where noted • click here to add this site to your bookmarks / favourites • ENIAR not responsible for external links content • webmasters — support this website by linking to it from yours  • many, many thanks to Paul Canning web design and GreenNet